"When [an offensive] player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. Wow! Second, the Raiders had every opportunity to win that. This solution also solves intentional grounding. To me it was pretty clearly an incomplete pass, tuck rule or no and Im not even a Chiefs fan. If you remove it, we open up a basket of worms, and fans will be upset a lot when their QB gets hit while his arm is moving forward and the ref says he was trying to reset, so it is a fumble. Luke Straub. If you watch the replay of Cassels arm (or Bradys for that matter) you can clearly see that his arm is moving forward when he loses possession. Has no one here ever heard of the Competition Committee ? On the opening drive of the third quarter, he connected with David Patten for gains of 25 and 19 yards as he led the Patriots 62 yards in 12 plays to the Raiders' 5-yard line, where Adam Vinatieri made a 23-yard field goal to make it 73. If the Raiders were that great how come they couldnt stop the Pats on one of the following plays ? In the waning minutes of the second quarter, Patriots defensive end Anthony Pleasant apparently forced Jets quarterback Vinny Testaverde to fumble the ball, with Patriots defensive end Richard Seymour making a recovery. When discussing Tom Brady and the "Tuck Rule," Ray Lewis was referring to the game-changing call made by the referee during the 2001 AFC divisional playoff game between the New England Patriots and the Oakland Raiders. 2 The 'tuck rule' became famous after a New England vs Oakland showdown in 2002 Credit: AFP It was the right call. I agree to receive the "Pick Six Newsletter" and marketing communications, updates, special offers (including partner offers), and other information from CBS Sports and the Paramount family of companies. When can I drink milk after taking iron supplements. But it was a rule. During ESPN's new 30 for 30 documentary called, "The Tuck Rule", the future Hall of Fame quarterback admitted that if he didn't lead the New. Brady, who recently announced his retirement, is now a seven-time Super Bowl champion who . It was a pump fake that he brought back to his body. I will never understand why the media will not set this straight. harrisonhits2 says: Jan 11, 2011 12:11 PM. How about simplifying the rules regarding a catch while they are at it. It was 10 years ago. That was the last great Rams team, not matter how their season ended. Here's the official ruling, from section 22, article 2 of the NFL's rulebook. While New England and Washington voted to keep it, Pittsburgh voted to keep it. A source told Ian Rapoport on Wednesday that the elimination of the "Tuck Rule" passed overwhelmingly at the NFL Annual Meeting in Phoenix. Brought into the game in 1999, the 'tuck rule' was controversial from the very beginning. Secondly, the call on the field was correct no matter how out of the blue it seemed at that time. "The Tuck Rule" changed Tom Brady's career. The nation was still recovering from 9/11. Nonetheless, Raiders quarterback Rich Gannon completed 10 of 14 passes for 87 yards. Thus, the original call was overturned, and New England maintained possession. There will be more than one character in some, Eggs are not commonly found in tortillas. Now, riders caught in any unsanctioned position, such as the supertuck or the time trial position, on or after April 1 will be sanctioned up to the point of suspension, according to a February 4 . After the officials reviewed the play, it was determined Brady was in a throwing motion and was attempting to "tuck" the ball towards his body, therefore making it an incomplete pass and resulting in the Patriots keeping the ball. FYI, I dont give a crap about the Ben Dreith call. "More than 68 percent of the leagues passes are short throws that target receivers either behind the line of scrimmage or within 10 yards of it. In the aftermath of the Tuck Rule Game, Patriots head coach Bill Belichick told ESPN, "I knew what the ruling should have been because we had dealt with that play a little bit earlier in the year on the other side of it. [7] The owners abolished the rule with a 291 vote at the 2013 annual meeting in Phoenix on March 20, 2013. By rule, it was not a fumble. Plain and simple. We all know, as well, that the Patsies were cheating during that game, even if Roger Goodell is too afraid to admit it. (#94 -> #33, for example). A backward pass = fumble. You can whine and moan about the rule all you want, but if Coleman made any other call other than the one he did would have been an injustice. A ten year mental lapse thanks Mike! sick and tired of Pereira, self-promoting pompous a$$, he would support such a change who cares. And since he'll retire after calling half the Pro Bowl later this month, he'll never get the chance. More like the Raiders started getting worn down near the end of the game, couldnt stop the Patriots offense or convert key third downs when it mattered. THE 'tuck rule' in the NFL is regarded as one of the most controversial in sports history. A lot of people see the incident as one of the NFLs great what ifs. I am sure the rest of the world is a better place after seeing your post above. Afterwards, referring obliquely to the 2002 Tuck Rule Game, Patriots owner Robert Kraft said, "I love the tuck rule, and forever will, and I know [longtime Raiders owner] Al Davis, may he rest in peace, is probably smiling. The officials initially called the play a recovered fumble, which would have sealed the victory for the Raiders. Wow. Thats what most Raiders fans cant ever grasp: it was not a bad call. Football legend Tom Brady has admitted that his career could have gone very differently if it wasn't for a ruling which went his way in 2002. It would create fucking chaos 10x a game. As a Patriots fan, I also support a rule change. @tooz56 Your explanations for years were at best inconsistent. Gruden was dismissive of Davis' views on the matter, and the subsequent breakdown in relations between owner and coach led to Gruden being traded to Tampa Bay and becoming their head coach in 2002. To me its simple to fix, the tuck is not a pass to a reciever, and to some extent its not a fumble. Later in the quarter, Patriots receiver Troy Brown returned Shane Lechler's 37-yard punt 27 yards to the Patriots 46-yard line. Im sure its no consolation to the many Raiders fans around the country. ", 2020 THE SUN, US, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY | YOUR AD CHOICES | SITEMAP, The 'tuck rule' became famous after a New England vs Oakland showdown in 2002, Brady in action during snowy conditions at what became known as the 'Tuck Rule Game'. Protect the ball and theres nothing to talk about. It was 2001. Roughing the passer? However, in the fourth quarter, Brady led the Patriots on a 10-play, 67-yard drive, completing nine consecutive passes for 61 yards and finishing it with a 6-yard touchdown run with 7:57 left that made the score 1310. Were things run differently back then? end of story. - It was 10 years ago. The NFL championship was the first in the club's history and began a period of dominance for the Patriots in the 2000s and 2010s that included eight additional Super Bowl appearances with five more titles, in Super Bowls XXXVIII, XXXIX, XLIX, LI, and LIII. The 106 Oakland Raiders were the #3 seed and had beaten the Jets in an AFC wild card game, 3824. The hit that time came from Tony Bryant rather than Charles Woodson. I think that the play 10 years ago should have been a fumble. I'm not sure how it wouldn't be incomplete. [18], Coordinates: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap}420534N 711603W / 42.09269N 71.26744W / 42.09269; -71.26744. No kidding Pereira. umm Big Ben is that you?? You had your chance the next season, and the Bucs beat you by 50 touchdowns New England ended up advancing into field goal range and an Adam Vinatieri 45-yard field goal sent the game into overtime. While the Patriots were slightly out of field-goal range, Brady dropped back to pass, with no open receivers. The final was Gruden's last game of his first stint as head coach of the Raiders; he was traded to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers before the following season. Brady had no intention of throwing the ball!!! But screen passes and checkdowns are relatively common. January 16, 2019 10:09 pm PT. The ball should not have to be loose in the act of passing for it to be ruled incomplete. Tom Brady finally admits Tuck Rule play 'might have been a fumble'. [13] The Pittsburgh Steelers voted against abolition, while two teams, the Patriots and Redskins, abstained from the vote. And, no, he would not have lost his job after coughing the ball up. With under a minute remaining in regulation time, Patriots' placekicker Adam Vinatieri kicked a 45-yard field goal to tie the game at 13, sending the game into overtime. Hearing Lewis say that the tuck rule is the only reason we know about a man who's won three Super Bowls, has twice been named NFL MVP (including the first-ever unanimous MVP), has made 10. Simple. He then got hit and fumbled. PRIDE AND POISE RAIDER NATION Dont fix what aint broke. On fourth down and 4 from the Raiders' 28, Brady hit Patten for a six-yard completion. Brown fumbled the ball at the end of the return, but Pats linebacker Larry Izzo recovered it with 2:06 left on the clock. raidernationbaby: It warms my heart to hear you say that. 4 Reply Jamie_Naughright Its called a clue. The NFL is the only football league that has this Tuck Rule. And having the help of replay, the ref ref who overturned the fumble should have been fired on the spot. Pereira opined on the tuck rule because it was applied on Sunday, when Chiefs quarterback Matt Cassel went back to pass and dropped the ball when he was hit by Baltimore's Lardarius Webb. NFL Coach's Challenge At any time before the two-minute warning of each half or overtime period, the head coach of either team can signal a challenge by throwing a red flag onto the field. The Tuck Rule has changed the careers of Tom Brady and Bill Belichick forever . The rule not only changed how referees call the game, but it also altered the trajectory of TB12's career, according to . Wow. Both teams struggled in the heavy snowstorm during the first half, combining for the same number of punts as first downs (11) and converting only one of 13 third downs. Had the play been ruled a fumble, the Patriots would have lost . They drove 61 yards in 15 plays, with Brady completing all eight of his pass attempts, for a total of 45 yards. My god. During the game, one play and referee ruling makes this an iconic and one of the most controversial games in recent NFL history: The Tuck Rule play. raidernationbaby says: According to the rule, he insists the call was made correctly and reiterated those feelings. If it is taken out, you have to decide when the forward arm motion stops being a pass and starts to become fumble territory. What a bunch of little women the Oakland fans are. ", "10 highlights from Jon Gruden's Raiders news conference, including 'Tom Brady fumbled' Reference", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuck_Rule_Game&oldid=1142353824, Sports competitions in Foxborough, Massachusetts, January 2002 sports events in the United States, 21st century in Foxborough, Massachusetts, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, This page was last edited on 1 March 2023, at 23:18. The Tom Brady rule states that a defender on the ground who has not been pushed into the quarterback cannot lunge at a quarterback's knee or lower legs. This weekend, ESPN will debut "The Tuck Rule," a "documentary" in the sense that it's a series of real people discussing, dissecting and squabbling over a real historical event the fateful. Mike Pereira, the former director of officiating of the NFL, noted that the design of the rule avoids the question of the quarterback's intention,[1] except that the referee still must judge whether the initial forward movement of the arm was "intentional". One, the Patriots are still moving forward from that moment and two, someone has to track down that old bastard Dreith and beat the truth out of him about his officiating in that playoff game. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Get over it, pathetic Raiders fans. [2] With 1:01 left in the second quarter, Patriots defensive end Anthony Pleasant apparently forced Jets quarterback Vinny Testaverde to fumble the ball, with Patriots defensive end Richard Seymour making a recovery. As a result, the original call was overturned, and the ball was given back to the Patriots, who subsequently moved the ball into field goal range. As a Patriots fan, I always thought it was a bad rule and wished it were changed, but I also want the refs to follow the rules rather than making stuff up to call. It sure looks like it did, or even got really really close, but there's no way you can say it 100% didn't touch it, therefore you couldn't be able to overturn the call. No such rule ever existed. The rule's elimination makes it so a quarterback. Walt Coleman hasn't refereed a single Raiders game since making the "tuck rule" call 17 years ago, a ruling that still reverberates throughout the league on occasion. Once the arm has moved forward with ball in hand, it is a pass attempt even after the arm has stopped moving forward (even voluntarily), until the time when the ball is tucked away, which means presumably not just in the QBs hand but protected by an arm. Tuck rule or not the raiders got robbed. That gave Brady the starting role over veteran Drew Bledsoe entering the 2002 season and the rest is history. 20 years later, the Tuck Rule remains one of the biggest and most polarizing moments in NFL history. The rule, applied to game play, makes absolutely no sense. But its not as if St. Louis would have replaced New England as the NFLs most successful organization. And thus a valid call. That should have been a roughing the passer call with 15 yards and a first down instead of just a second down. The tuck rule was an exception to this rule. The tuck rule, like it or hate it, was correctly called. Who cares if they throw out the rule or not. And even if they got there, the high-powered Rams awaited. That has to be the dumbest rule in the book. The Rams were known at the time as the greatest show on turf, but Brady and the Patriots defeated the Rams 20-17. . How is the ref supposed to determine the exact moment when an arm moving forward transitions from a throwing motion to a tucking motion? Sometimes you have to look past the ignorant fans and complex rationalizations they come up with and watch the damn play. Brady ended up completing 26 of 39 passes for 238 yards in the second half. Brady rushed in for a touchdown to cut the lead to 13-10. But the rule, while it . Tom Ruggie, one of RWE's principals, runs another RIA called Ruggie Wealth Management that keeps most of its $210 million of client assets with LPL Financial. Its just like that asinine interpretation about end-zone catches requiring a Football Move after the catch to be ruled a completion. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.". How would that be a fumble? That set the tone for two more Raiders Super Bowl victories in the following decade. The game, known as both the Snow Bowl (for that copious and unceasing precipitation) and the Tuck Rule Game (for the enduringly controversial call that ultimately swung the contest toward the. No . But they didnt win. You had your chance the next season, and the Bucs beat you by 50 touchdowns. What has now become known as the "Tuck Rule" game was played on January 19, 2002. Is, To avoid this problem, you may need to take iron with a small amount of food. The rule not only changed how referees call the game, but it also altered the trajectory of TB12's 4. If your loser team was that great why couldnt they stop the drives after the tuck play ? The Raiders at one point paralyzed a Patriot player. To make the right call. In 2008, Brady suffered two torn ligaments during the Patriots season-opening game with the Kansas City Chiefs. Pereira said Carey properly applied the rule as its written, just as Pereira has always said referee Walt Coleman properly applied the rule when he overturned what appeared to be a Tom Brady fumble in a playoff game against the Raiders nine years ago. After Brady dove to the 5 and centered the ball, Vinatieri kicked a 23-yard field goal, giving the Patriots a 1613 victory and advancing them to the AFC Championship Game. - This season marks the 10th anniversary of the famous "Tuck Rule" game between the New England Patriots and Oakland Raiders. Tom Brady should have to throw left handed if he hasnt thrown an INT in three games. It would be the same as saying when a QB is handing off to a RB and the ball comes out, the QB is technically passing the ball to the RB so it should be an incomplete pass, also. In week 2 of the NFL season in 2001. Stay classyAwesome post (especially like you putting god in your postMind you it was a little g since you are probably a church going man). After NFL owners voted 29-1 to repeal the controversial Tuck Rule at the annual meeting in Phoenix on Wednesday, it is no longer in effect. Outside of the winner of Super Bowl XXXVI, not much would have changed. remember its the same ref that was in for the ravens vs raiders championship a year before when that fat lose goose broke gannons arm so the raiders would lose Arm is moving forward, still in the throwing motion, they hit his arm and he let's go of the ball early and it hits the ground. The "tuck rule" grew in prominence in 2002, when an apparent Tom Brady fumble on this play was called back because of the rule. If it goes against the Raiders, reverse the call on the field. You state that Tom Brady suffered a blow to the head from Charles Woodson on the play which should have been a penalty on the Raiders. Now he tells us! "That's the way the play was called," Belichick said. Any ref who cannot see that is a fumble with more than one look should not have a job as a ref. Many feel it was a controversial play that allowed New England to move on, win their first Super Bowl and set the tone for all that have accomplished since. This is consistent with most NFL rules as the league tries to make as many rules applications as possible a simple black-white decision (think helmet-to-helmet contact). In this case, they clearly took a victory away from the Raiders. The NHL's version of the "tuck rule" hasn't drawn the most positive response from fans and certain players since it became something officials would finally crack down on this season.. Its really more sadness and pity than anything. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like "I volunteer!" I gasp. I love how people give the raiders so much attention. Whatever patriot fans. "[12] Several Raiders players and observers also said that the Tuck Rule led to head coach Jon Gruden's departure from the team, as owner Al Davis was apparently angry that Gruden did not protest the call vehemently enough. If the Raiders pull out the Tuck Rule game, they are probably losing one of their next two games, and doing so in embarrassing fashion. First, the Tuck Rule was not only a bad rule, but it wasn't applicable on the basis of overwhelming evidence and the Raiders got screwed. thats why we have instant replay now. Fact is, the refs blew that call and then the league tried to justify it by making a made-up interpretation of the rule. Do me a favorgoogle it and watch the replay. Wow man I didnt realize what crybabies Raiders fans are even after 10 years. The Raiders appeared to be dominating to this point of the game. The rule makes sense the way it is, changing it would just create ambiguity. It applied if the quarterback moved his arm forward in a passing motion, but then changed his mind and tried to keep hold of the football rather than attempt a pass. Unfortunately, most fans will never take the time to see why the rule is there in the first place. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.[1]. . They all need to be replaced and as far away from a football game as possible if they cant see thats a fumble. Please check your email for a confirmation. It prohibits runners and defenders from lowering their heads and striking a forcible blow with. Please explain Einstein how you can have an incomplete pass without first throwing the football? terumiarai says: Some may find it surprising that many of the leagues passes target players behind the line of scrimmage. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time), As far as the tuck rule.. This rule is fine, its only the whining fans of teams that are unable to do their jobs well enough to win that want this rule changed. The game, played under a heavy snowfall, was the last at Foxboro Stadium. Yes maybe it was the correct rule or whatever, I'm not arguing that. Referees initially called the play a fumble and awarded the Redskins a safety, but after instant-replay review cited the tuck rule in reversing the decision and calling it an incomplete pass.